The administration has admitted to knowledge of the presence of children in or near Iraqi government buildings, yet they still proceed with their plans to bomb -- saying that they cannot be held responsible if children die.
In this context, do people come to believe that the killing of foreigners is somehow different than the killing of Americans?
For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. There is no such proof, however, that knowledge of the presence of children existed in relation to the Oklahoma City bombing.
Then again, the history of United States policy over the last century, when examined fully, tends to exemplify hypocrisy. I recently read of an arrest in New York City where possession of a mere pipe bomb was charged as possession of a "weapon of mass destruction.
Well, if that"s the standard by which these matters are decided, then the U.
If Saddam is such a demon, and people are calling for war crimes charges and trials against him and his nation, why do we not hear the same cry for blood directed at those responsible for even greater amounts of "mass destruction" -- like those responsible and involved in dropping bombs on the cities mentioned above?
We"ve all seen the pictures that show a Kurdish woman and child frozen in death from the use of chemical weapons. Yet when discussion shifts to Iraq, any day-care center in a government building instantly becomes "a shield. It seems ironic and hypocritical that an act viciously condemned in Oklahoma City is now a "justified" response to a problem in a foreign land.
Whether you wish to admit it or not, when you approve, morally, of the bombing of foreign targets by the U. These are weapons of mass destruction -- and the method of delivery matters little to those on the receiving end of such weapons.
The only difference is that this nation is not going to see any foreign casualties appear on the cover of Newsweek magazine. The truth is, the U. Hypocrisy when it comes to death of children? At these two locations, the U. Yet another example of this nation"s blatant hypocrisy is revealed by the polls which suggest that this nation is greatly in favor of bombing Iraq.
Do they think that Iraqis don"t have families who will grieve and mourn the loss of their loved ones? The administration claims that Iraq has used these weapons in the past. Actually, there is a difference here. Why, then is it invalid for Iraq to claim the same reason deterrence -- with respect to Iraq"s real war with, and the continued threat of, its neighbor Iran?
What motivates these seemingly contradictory positions? Do people think that government workers in Iraq are any less human than those in Oklahoma City? What about the big ones -- Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
But, have you ever seen these pictures juxtaposed next to pictures from Hiroshima or Nagasaki? In this instance, the people of the nation approve of bombing government employees because they are "guilty by association" -- they are Iraqi government employees.
Who are the true barbarians? When considering the use of weapons of mass destruction against Iraq as a means to an end, it would be wise to reflect on the words of the late U. Unfortunately, the morality of killing is not so superficial.
Thousands more took hours, days, weeks, or months to die. What a convenient way to absolve these killers of any responsibility for the destruction they leave in their wake. I find it ironic, to say the least, that one of the aircraft that could be used to drop such a bomb on Iraq is dubbed "The Spirit of Oklahoma.
In a preface, McVeigh wrote "I have chosen Media Bypass as a possible forum for this piece because, frankly, I realize that it is quite provocative -- and I rather doubt that any mainstream media would touch it.
When considering morality and mens rea [criminal intent] in light of these facts, I ask: In Oklahoma City, it was family convenience that explained the presence of a day-care center placed between street level and the law enforcement agencies which occupied the upper floors of the building.
In regard to the bombing in Oklahoma City, however, such logic is condemned.
His words are as true in the context of Olmstead as they are when they stand alone:Timothy McVeigh Essay Timothy James McVeigh is the American citizen that is responsible for the Oklahoma City Bombing.
The Oklahoma City Bombing is labeled as the deadliest act of terrorism in the United States prior to the September Mcveigh essay attacks, and to this day remains the most serious act of domestic terrorism in the United States. Timothy McVeigh (April 23, June 11, ) is popularly known as the convicted bomber of the Oklahoma Bombings which occurred on April 19, Oklahoma City Bombing: Timothy McVeigh Essay Words 5 Pages The Oklahoma City Bombing was a domestic terrorist bomb attack on the Alfred P.
Murrah Murrah Federal Building in. Jul 14, · Media Bypass Editor"s note: Timothy McVeigh, sentenced to death for his role in the April 19, bombing in Oklahoma City, penned the following essay, dated "March ," from his cell in the administrative maximum section of the federal prison in Florence, Colo.
On April 19, – Timothy McVeigh, the infamous, Oklahoma City Bomber drove a rented Rider truck filled with explosives to the front of Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City.
Oklahoma City Bombing: Timothy McVeigh Essay Words | 5 Pages. bomb attack on the Alfred P. Murrah Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City in April 19, It was lead by Timothy McVeigh, an Army veteran of the Persian Gulf War.Download